MIND CONTROL : A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF BRAINWAVE ENTRAINMENT

A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF BRAINWAVE ENTRAINMENT.pdf

MIND CONTROL /// Stealth evolution : Humans and technology merge

Inventor and futurist Ray Kurzweil predicts that before mid-century, the exponential acceleration of information technologies, robotics, medical science, and artificial intelligence will result in a "singularity," a point at which humans will essentially merge with their technology. Such an event may seem implausible, but discoveries of how technology and humans really interact are being made every day, leading one to the conclusion that it’s not an unimaginable future — and it may be the key to sustainable living on an increasingly overcrowded planet.

Heart pacemakers and artificial hips already demonstrate the seeds of Kurzweil’s vision and innovations like Google Glass will get more real-time information a lot closer to us very soon. But could we use such technology to measure what our bodies actually need and then design foods and homes that maximize our limited resources to sustain a growing population?

The U.S. Department of Defense has been working on these ideas since 2008 at its National Center for Telehealth and Technology, introducing wearable sensors that report to smartphones on a user’s health and wellness. Called "BioZen," the system shows real-time data from the heart, respiration, skin responses, temperature, blood chemistry, and brain waves. The data are used to determine what medicine or nutrition might be needed by the soldier in the field or by the returning veteran undergoing rehabilitation.

(Read more: Is Samsung focusing on a rival to Google glass?)

Dozens of companies all over the globe are working on various versions of BioZen, bringing down cost, increasing functionality, and improving the analytics. These technologies can make limited health-care dollars go a lot farther by preventing illness or by identifying and treating conditions much earlier. Using the same technology to monitor our nutritional needs, and the actual value of the foods we consume, will fundamentally change the way we grow, process, and deliver food to consumers in the future.

Another example of taking a cue from our bodies and improving the technology to meet those demands comes from NASA. Astronauts in the International Space Station go through a 24-hour day of light and dark every ninety minutes. Not surprisingly, their sleep is disrupted and productivity is impacted, so high-tech lights are tuned to mimic natural daylight, stimulating alertness. At "night," when light may be needed for performing some tasks, but astronauts want to avoid stimulation that inhibits sleep, special lights filter out certain wavelengths for a more restful environment.

Florida-based Lighting Science Group, which designed these lights for NASA, has brought the technology to earth with its Definity Digital light bulbs that give you the choice of being alert or promoting sleep (Disclosure: I was so impressed by the company, I invested in their stock). A growing number of studies highlight this problem on Earth, where we spend hours before bedtime illuminated by computer screens, TVs, and other lights that make us more alert at precisely the time we want to start decompressing and getting ready for restful sleep. By combining things like BioZen sensors and Definity lights in the future, the body could send

signals to tune lights for our bodies’ needs making us more productive and healthy.

(Read more: Apple to launch iPhone with curved screen)

And lest you think that these developments are the sole domain of science fiction or risky Silicon Valley venture capitalists, tech giant Qualcomm is sponsoring a $10 million Tricorder XPRIZE competition to stimulate more innovation in the "integration of precision diagnostic technologies," specifically diagnosing a patient’s health from his or her mobile device.

The "singularity" event when man and machine merge may actually be more of a series of "multiplicity" events that collectively make better use of scientific discovery and information technology, but either way, our lives are about to evolve into a digital existence that can make us healthier and more sustainable for the foreseeable future.

— By Terry Tamminen

Terry Tamminen is former secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency, is president of Seventh Generation Advisors and co-founder of the R20 Regions of Climate Action. Follow him on Twitter @terrytamminen.

Disclosure: Terry Tamminen owns shares of Lighting Science Group.

MIND CONTROL /// VİDEO : How All Of Society Is Under Mind Control /// Dr. Patrick Flanagan – Jeff Rense

VİDEO LİNK :

MIND CONTROL : Seattle police department has network that can track all Wi-Fi enabled devices

The Seattle Police Department purchased a “mesh network” in February that will be used by emergency responders, but which will also be capable of tracking anyone with Wi-Fi enabled device.

The network is not yet turned on, according to Seattle Police, but once it is, it will be able to determine the IP address, device type, downloaded applications, current location, and historical location of any device that searches for a Wi-Fi signal. The network is capable of storing that information for the previous 1,000 times a particular device attempted to access a Wi-Fi signal.

Jamela Debelak, of the American Civil Liberties Union (ALCU), is worried that police will use the network for more than just coordinating emergency responders. “They now own a piece of equipment that has tracking capabilities so we think that they should be going to City Council and presenting a protocol for the whole network that says they won’t be using it for surveillance purposes,” she told KIRO 7.

“Once these kinds of tools are in place, they don’t go away. Even if we assume that the mesh network was installed by good people for good reasons, there’s no reason to believe that the people controlling the network in the future will use it for the public good.”

Seattle City Councilmen Bruce Harrell assured KIRO 7 that the network would not be used for surveillance purposes. “While I understand that a lot of people have concerns about the government having access to this information,” he said, “when we have large public gatherings like the situation in Boston and something bad happens, the first thing we want to know is how are we using technology to capture that information.”

Moreover, he continued, “the council made it crystal clear that before the ‘on’ button is turned on, before it’s being used they have to go to the public.”

Debelak wonders why, if it’s not yet turned on, access points are already appearing around the city with names like “4th&Pike” and “3rd&Union.” Seattle police could not explain why.

The network was purchased with a $2.6 million grant from the Department of Homeland Security.

Watch the KIRO 7 report on the network below.

VİDEOYU BURADAN İZLEYEBİLİRSİNİZ.

MIND CONTROL : The Gentleman’s Guide to Forum Spies

MarthaMitchellEffect

Home

Articles

1. COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum

2. Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation

3. Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist

4. How to Spot a Spy (Cointelpro Agent)

5. Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum..

There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a ‘uncontrolled forum.’

Technique #1 – ‘FORUM SLIDING’

If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum – it can be quickly removed from public view by ‘forum sliding.’ In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to ‘age.’ Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a ‘forum slide.’ The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a ‘forum slide’ and ‘flush’ the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then ‘replying’ to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting ‘slides’ down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.

Technique #2 – ‘CONSENSUS CRACKING’

A second highly effective technique (which you can see in operation all the time at http://www.abovetopsecret.com) is ‘consensus cracking.’ To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made – but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger ‘evidence’ or disinformation in your favour is slowly ‘seeded in.’ Thus the uninformed reader will most like develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped. However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then ‘abort’ the consensus cracking by initiating a ‘forum slide.’

Technique #3 – ‘TOPIC DILUTION’

Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a ‘RESOURCE BURN.’ By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a ‘gossip mode.’ In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to ‘drive in the wedge.’ By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.

Technique #4 – ‘INFORMATION COLLECTION’

Information collection is also a very effective method to determine the psychological level of the forum members, and to gather intelligence that can be used against them. In this technique in a light and positive environment a ‘show you mine so me yours’ posting is initiated. From the number of replies and the answers that are provided much statistical information can be gathered. An example is to post your ‘favourite weapon’ and then encourage other members of the forum to showcase what they have. In this matter it can be determined by reverse proration what percentage of the forum community owns a firearm, and or a illegal weapon. This same method can be used by posing as one of the form members and posting your favourite ‘technique of operation.’ From the replies various methods that the group utilizes can be studied and effective methods developed to stop them from their activities.

Technique #5 – ‘ANGER TROLLING’

Statistically, there is always a percentage of the forum posters who are more inclined to violence. In order to determine who these individuals are, it is a requirement to present a image to the forum to deliberately incite a strong psychological reaction. From this the most violent in the group can be effectively singled out for reverse IP location and possibly local enforcement tracking. To accomplish this only requires posting a link to a video depicting a local police officer massively abusing his power against a very innocent individual. Statistically of the million or so police officers in America there is always one or two being caught abusing there powers and the taping of the activity can be then used for intelligence gathering purposes – without the requirement to ‘stage’ a fake abuse video. This method is extremely effective, and the more so the more abusive the video can be made to look. Sometimes it is useful to ‘lead’ the forum by replying to your own posting with your own statement of violent intent, and that you ‘do not care what the authorities think!!’ inflammation. By doing this and showing no fear it may be more effective in getting the more silent and self-disciplined violent intent members of the forum to slip and post their real intentions. This can be used later in a court of law during prosecution.

Technique #6 – ‘GAINING FULL CONTROL’

It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position. Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavourable postings – and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public. This is the ‘ultimate victory’ as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline. By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a ‘honey pot’ gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes.

CONCLUSION

Remember these techniques are only effective if the forum participants DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM. Once they are aware of these techniques the operation can completely fail, and the forum can become uncontrolled. At this point other avenues must be considered such as initiating a false legal precidence to simply have the forum shut down and taken offline. This is not desirable as it then leaves the enforcement agencies unable to track the percentage of those in the population who always resist attempts for control against them. Many other techniques can be utilized and developed by the individual and as you develop further techniques of infiltration and control it is imperative to share then with HQ.

Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation

Note: The first rule and last five (or six, depending on situation) rules are generally not directly within the ability of the traditional disinfo artist to apply. These rules are generally used more directly by those at the leadership, key players, or planning level of the criminal conspiracy or conspiracy to cover up.

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the ‘How dare you!’ gambit.

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such ‘arguable rumors’. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a ‘wild rumor’ from a ‘bunch of kids on the Internet’ which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary ‘attack the messenger’ ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as ‘kooks’, ‘right-wing’, ‘liberal’, ‘left-wing’, ‘terrorists’, ‘conspiracy buffs’, ‘radicals’, ‘militia’, ‘racists’, ‘religious fanatics’, ‘sexual deviates’, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism, reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.

7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough ‘jargon’ and ‘minutia’ to illustrate you are ‘one who knows’, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man — usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with – a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the ‘high road’ and ‘confess’ with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, ‘just isn’t so.’ Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly ‘call for an end to the nonsense’ because you have already ‘done the right thing.’ Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for ‘coming clean’ and ‘owning up’ to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.

14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.

15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

16. Vanish evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can ‘argue’ with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how ‘sensitive they are to criticism.’

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the ‘play dumb’ rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations — as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed and unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim.

22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally, or severely damaging their health.

25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.

Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist

1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility.

2) Selectivity. They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentator become argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the commentator as well.

3) Coincidental. They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions in the particular public arena involved. They likewise tend to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with the reason.

4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.

5) Anti-conspiratorial. They almost always have disdain for ‘conspiracy theorists’ and, usually, for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain.Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.

6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of ‘artificial’ emotionalism and an unusually thick skin — an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial.

Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the ‘image’ and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It’s just a job, and they often seem unable to ‘act their role in character’ as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later — an emotional yo-yo.

With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game — where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up.

7) Inconsistent. There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives. This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat ‘freudian’, so to speak, in that perhaps they really root for the side of truth deep within.

I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory information which neutralizes itself and the author. For instance, one such player claimed to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having only a grade-school education. I’m not aware of too many Navy pilots who don’t have a college degree. Another claimed no knowledge of a particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand knowledge of it.

8) Time Constant. Recently discovered, with respect to News Groups, is the response time factor. There are three ways this can be seen to work, especially when the government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation:

a) ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for truth can result in an IMMEDIATE response. The government and other empowered players can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity to do some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER SEES IT – FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed towards truth.

b) When dealing in more direct ways with a disinformationalist, such as email, DELAY IS CALLED FOR – there will usually be a minimum of a 48-72 hour delay. This allows a sit-down team discussion on response strategy for best effect, and even enough time to ‘get permission’ or instruction from a formal chain of command.

c) In the NG example 1) above, it will often ALSO be seen that bigger guns are drawn and fired after the same 48-72 hours delay – the team approach in play. This is especially true when the targeted truth seeker or their comments are considered more important with respect to potential to reveal truth. Thus, a serious truth sayer will be attacked twice for the same sin.

How to Spot a Spy (Cointelpro Agent)

One way to neutralize a potential activist is to get them to be in a group that does all the wrong things. Why?

1) The message doesn’t get out.

2) A lot of time is wasted

3) The activist is frustrated and discouraged

4) Nothing good is accomplished.

FBI and Police Informers and Infiltrators will infest any group and they have phoney activist organizations established.

Their purpose is to prevent any real movement for justice or eco-peace from developing in this country.

Agents come in small, medium or large. They can be of any ethnic background. They can be male or female.

The actual size of the group or movement being infiltrated is irrelevant. It is the potential the movement has for becoming large which brings on the spies and saboteurs.

This booklet lists tactics agents use to slow things down, foul things up, destroy the movement and keep tabs on activists.

It is the agent’s job to keep the activist from quitting such a group, thus keeping him/her under control.

In some situations, to get control, the agent will tell the activist:

"You’re dividing the movement."

[Here, I have added the psychological reasons as to WHY this maneuver works to control people]

This invites guilty feelings. Many people can be controlled by guilt. The agents begin relationships with activists behind a well-developed mask of "dedication to the cause." Because of their often declared dedication, (and actions designed to prove this), when they criticize the activist, he or she – being truly dedicated to the movement – becomes convinced that somehow, any issues are THEIR fault. This is because a truly dedicated person tends to believe that everyone has a conscience and that nobody would dissimulate and lie like that "on purpose." It’s amazing how far agents can go in manipulating an activist because the activist will constantly make excuses for the agent who regularly declares their dedication to the cause. Even if they do, occasionally, suspect the agent, they will pull the wool over their own eyes by rationalizing: "they did that unconsciously… they didn’t really mean it… I can help them by being forgiving and accepting " and so on and so forth.

The agent will tell the activist:

"You’re a leader!"

This is designed to enhance the activist’s self-esteem. His or her narcissistic admiration of his/her own activist/altruistic intentions increase as he or she identifies with and consciously admires the altruistic declarations of the agent which are deliberately set up to mirror those of the activist.

This is "malignant pseudoidentification." It is the process by which the agent consciously imitates or simulates a certain behavior to foster the activist’s identification with him/her, thus increasing the activist’s vulnerability to exploitation. The agent will simulate the more subtle self-concepts of the activist.

Activists and those who have altruistic self-concepts are most vulnerable to malignant pseudoidentification especially during work with the agent when the interaction includes matter relating to their competency, autonomy, or knowledge.

The goal of the agent is to increase the activist’s general empathy for the agent through pseudo-identification with the activist’s self-concepts.

The most common example of this is the agent who will compliment the activist for his competency or knowledge or value to the movement. On a more subtle level, the agent will simulate affects and mannerisms of the activist which promotes identification via mirroring and feelings of "twinship". It is not unheard of for activists, enamored by the perceived helpfulness and competence of a good agent, to find themselves considering ethical violations and perhaps, even illegal behavior, in the service of their agent/handler.

The activist’s "felt quality of perfection" [self-concept] is enhanced, and a strong empathic bond is developed with the agent through his/her imitation and simulation of the victim’s own narcissistic investments. [self-concepts] That is, if the activist knows, deep inside, their own dedication to the cause, they will project that onto the agent who is "mirroring" them.

The activist will be deluded into thinking that the agent shares this feeling of identification and bonding. In an activist/social movement setting, the adversarial roles that activists naturally play vis a vis the establishment/government, fosters ongoing processes of intrapsychic splitting so that "twinship alliances" between activist and agent may render whole sectors or reality testing unavailable to the activist. They literally "lose touch with reality."

Activists who deny their own narcissistic investments [do not have a good idea of their own self-concepts and that they ARE concepts] and consciously perceive themselves (accurately, as it were) to be "helpers" endowed with a special amount of altruism are exceedingly vulnerable to the affective (emotional) simulation of the accomplished agent.

Empathy is fostered in the activist through the expression of quite visible affects. The presentation of tearfulness, sadness, longing, fear, remorse, and guilt, may induce in the helper-oriented activist a strong sense of compassion, while unconsciously enhancing the activist’s narcissistic investment in self as the embodiment of goodness.

The agent’s expresssion of such simulated affects may be quite compelling to the observer and difficult to distinguish from deep emotion.

It can usually be identified by two events, however:

First, the activist who has analyzed his/her own narcissistic roots and is aware of his/her own potential for being "emotionally hooked," will be able to remain cool and unaffected by such emotional outpourings by the agent.

As a result of this unaffected, cool, attitude, the Second event will occur: The agent will recompensate much too quickly following such an affective expression leaving the activist with the impression that "the play has ended, the curtain has fallen," and the imposture, for the moment, has finished. The agent will then move quickly to another activist/victim.

The fact is, the movement doesn’t need leaders, it needs MOVERS. "Follow the leader" is a waste of time.

A good agent will want to meet as often as possible. He or she will talk a lot and say little. One can expect an onslaught of long, unresolved discussions.

Some agents take on a pushy, arrogant, or defensive manner:

1) To disrupt the agenda

2) To side-track the discussion

3) To interrupt repeatedly

4) To feign ignorance

5) To make an unfounded accusation against a person.

Calling someone a racist, for example. This tactic is used to discredit a person in the eyes of all other group members.

Saboteurs

Some saboteurs pretend to be activists. She or he will ….

1) Write encyclopedic flyers (in the present day, websites)

2) Print flyers in English only.

3) Have demonstrations in places where no one cares.

4) Solicit funding from rich people instead of grass roots support

5) Display banners with too many words that are confusing.

6) Confuse issues.

7) Make the wrong demands.

Cool Compromise the goal.

9) Have endless discussions that waste everyone’s time. The agent may accompany the endless discussions with drinking, pot smoking or other amusement to slow down the activist’s work.

Provocateurs

1) Want to establish "leaders" to set them up for a fall in order to stop the movement.

2) Suggest doing foolish, illegal things to get the activists in trouble.

3) Encourage militancy.

4) Want to taunt the authorities.

5) Attempt to make the activist compromise their values.

6) Attempt to instigate violence. Activisim ought to always be non-violent.

7) Attempt to provoke revolt among people who are ill-prepared to deal with the reaction of the authorities to such violence.

Informants

1) Want everyone to sign up and sing in and sign everything.

2) Ask a lot of questions (gathering data).

3) Want to know what events the activist is planning to attend.

4) Attempt to make the activist defend him or herself to identify his or her beliefs, goals, and level of committment.

Recruiting

Legitimate activists do not subject people to hours of persuasive dialog. Their actions, beliefs, and goals speak for themselves.

Groups that DO recruit are missionaries, military, and fake political parties or movements set up by agents.

Surveillance

ALWAYS assume that you are under surveillance.

At this point, if you are NOT under surveillance, you are not a very good activist!

Scare Tactics

They use them.

Such tactics include slander, defamation, threats, getting close to disaffected or minimally committed fellow activists to persuade them (via psychological tactics described above) to turn against the movement and give false testimony against their former compatriots. They will plant illegal substances on the activist and set up an arrest; they will plant false information and set up "exposure," they will send incriminating letters [emails] in the name of the activist; and more; they will do whatever society will allow.

This booklet in no way covers all the ways agents use to sabotage the lives of sincere an dedicated activists.

If an agent is "exposed," he or she will be transferred or replaced.

COINTELPRO is still in operation today under a different code name. It is no longer placed on paper where it can be discovered through the freedom of information act.

The FBI counterintelligence program’s stated purpose: To expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, and otherwise neutralize individuals who the FBI categorize as opposed to the National Interests. "National Security" means the FBI’s security from the people ever finding out the vicious things it does in violation of people’s civil liberties.

Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Strong, credible allegations of high-level criminal activity can bring down a government. When the government lacks an effective, fact-based defense, other techniques must be employed. The success of these techniques depends heavily upon a cooperative, compliant press and a mere token opposition party.

1. Dummy up. If it’s not reported, if it’s not news, it didn’t happen.

2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "How dare you?" gambit.

3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors." (If they tend to believe the "rumors" it must be because they are simply "paranoid" or "hysterical.")

4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspects of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors (or plant false stories) and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.

5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nutcase," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and, of course, "rumor monger." Be sure, too, to use heavily loaded verbs and adjectives when characterizing their charges and defending the "more reasonable" government and its defenders. You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned. For insurance, set up your own "skeptics" to shoot down.

6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money (compared to over-compensated adherents to the government line who, presumably, are not).

7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.

8. Dismiss the charges as "old news."

9. Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession and avoidance" or "taking the limited hangout route." This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal "mistakes." This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken. With effective damage control, the fall-back position need only be peddled by stooge skeptics to carefully limited markets.

10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.

11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. E.g. We have a completely free press. If evidence exists that the Vince Foster "suicide" note was forged, they would have reported it. They haven’t reported it so there is no such evidence. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press who would report the leak.

12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely. E.g. If Foster was murdered, who did it and why?

13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or publicizing distractions.

14. Lightly report incriminating facts, and then make nothing of them. This is sometimes referred to as "bump and run" reporting.

15. Baldly and brazenly lie. A favorite way of doing this is to attribute the "facts" furnished the public to a plausible-sounding, but anonymous, source.

16. Expanding further on numbers 4 and 5, have your own stooges "expose" scandals and champion popular causes. Their job is to pre-empt real opponents and to play 99-yard football. A variation is to pay rich people for the job who will pretend to spend their own money.

17. Flood the Internet with agents. This is the answer to the question, "What could possibly motivate a person to spend hour upon hour on Internet news groups defending the government and/or the press and harassing genuine critics?" Don t the authorities have defenders enough in all the newspapers, magazines, radio, and television? One would think refusing to print critical letters and screening out serious callers or dumping them from radio talk shows would be control enough, but, obviously, it is not.

author unknown / anonymous

MIND CONTROL : Scientists construct first map of how the brain organizes everything we see

Our eyes may be our window to the world, but how do we make sense of the thousands of images that flood our retinas each day? Scientists at the University of California, Berkeley, have found that the brain is wired to put in order all the categories of objects and actions that we see. They have created the first interactive map of how the brain organizes these groupings.

Alex Huth explains the science of how the brain organizes visual categories. (Alex Huth video)

The result — achieved through computational models of brain imaging data collected while the subjects watched hours of movie clips — is what researchers call “a continuous semantic space.”

VİDEO LİNK :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=u9nMfaWqkVE

Some relationships between categories make sense (humans and animals share the same “semantic neighborhood”) while others (hallways and buckets) are less obvious. The researchers found that different people share a similar semantic layout.

“Our methods open a door that will quickly lead to a more complete and detailed understanding of how the brain is organized. Already, our online brain viewer appears to provide the most detailed look ever at the visual function and organization of a single human brain,” said Alexander Huth, a doctoral student in neuroscience at UC Berkeley and lead author of the study published today (Wednesday, Dec. 19) in the journal Neuron.

A clearer understanding of how the brain organizes visual input can help with the medical diagnosis and treatment of brain disorders. These findings may also be used to create brain-machine interfaces, particularly for facial and other image recognition systems. Among other things, they could improve a grocery store self-checkout system’s ability to recognize different kinds of merchandise.

”Our discovery suggests that brain scans could soon be used to label an image that someone is seeing, and may also help teach computers how to better recognize images,” said Huth, who has produced a video and interactive website to explain the science of what the researchers found.

It has long been thought that each category of object or action humans see — people, animals, vehicles, household appliances and movements — is represented in a separate region of the visual cortex. In this latest study, UC Berkeley researchers found that these categories are actually represented in highly organized, overlapping maps that cover as much as 20 percent of the brain, including the somatosensory and frontal cortices.

Maps show how different categories of living and non-living objects that we see are related to one another in the brain’s “semantic space.”

To conduct the experiment, the brain activity of five researchers was recorded via functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) as they each watched two hours of movie clips. The brain scans simultaneously measured blood flow in thousands of locations across the brain.

Researchers then used regularized linear regression analysis, which finds correlations in data, to build a model showing how each of the roughly 30,000 locations in the cortex responded to each of the 1,700 categories of objects and actions seen in the movie clips. Next, they used principal components analysis, a statistical method that can summarize large data sets, to find the “semantic space” that was common to all the study subjects.

The results are presented in multicolored, multidimensional maps showing the more than 1,700 visual categories and their relationships to one another. Categories that activate the same brain areas have similar colors. For example, humans are green, animals are yellow, vehicles are pink and violet and buildings are blue. For more details about the experiment, watch the video above.

“Using the semantic space as a visualization tool, we immediately saw that categories are represented in these incredibly intricate maps that cover much more of the brain than we expected,” Huth said.

Other co-authors of the study are UC Berkeley neuroscientists Shinji Nishimoto, An T. Vu and Jack Gallant.

MIND CONTROL : (Remote) Electronic Mind Reading & (Remote) Electronic Mind Control #4

Thought police, spying, remote control animals and human beings

The Thought Police as described by George Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984) in 1949, has become a reality. They ‘search, find and kill members of society who could potentially challenge authority and status quo, even only by thought’. At the time of writing only a limited number of people are watched this way. It is just a matter of time and resources like computers, when this is applied to many. In 2002 (!) an article appeared that ‘NASA plans to read terrorist’s minds at airports’. Although NASA said this was just an idea, while experimenting with mind reading, this is not just some crazy idea. In 2004 reports appeared that NASA developed a ‘mind-reading’ system by decoding words silently spoken to oneself (sub-vocal speech).

In 2008 I wrote an article Secret service: fear for the truth to be revealed!(18) – Pigeon ON-OFF and other outdoor sounds (crows, dogs, cats, electric (sawing) machines, hammering, motorbikes, coughing, etc.) used with gang stalking and electronic harassment/electronic torture. In this article I described how pigeons, crows, cat and dogs are used by secret services to murder their targets (by driving them out-of-their-minds). I have experienced (many times):

• Birds that can be turned on and off (instantly) to produce sounds, e.g. pigeon cooing on-off, crows and pigeon screaming on-off (on-off is to synchronize with what I am doing or thinking)
• Birds, pigeons and crows, that can be controlled to fly (screaming) over me, to land in my garden when I walk into my kitchen and look outside, to crash into my kitchen window and car front window while driving
• Birds, pigeons, that come sit, walk, on the roof of my house when I am upstairs having sex.
• Cats walking by like being programmed
• Barking of dogs, flying away ducks, etc. not by mind control but by beaming these animals wiith laser beams (directed energy weapons)

Now suppose, they cannot look through our eyes, but that they can look through the eyes of a cat. And they can also mind control a cat, or a bird. Then we have here the perfect spies.

In the 2009 film Avatar by James Cameron, real human beings use their brain to control animals and ‘constructed’ Na’vis, i.e. androids. They link themselves to the brain of a dragon or an android Na’vi and take over their brain (brain link). So when they think ‘fly to left’, the dragon flies to the left. When they want to talk, they walk or talk they walk with the body of the android and talk via the mouth of the android. Is technology already here that man can control e.g. a cat this way? Already a number of experiments are known where thinking of e.g. raising your arm really can control an artificial arm (prosthesis). I believe an application where man can control a cat by looking through his eyes, hearing through his ears, and controlling the mind of the cat is just a few years away from now. Maybe it is already possible today.

Note that remote control of birds is already possible. Chinese scientists reported this in 2005 and 2007, see links below for article. In 2007 they demonstrated in that pigeons can be implanted with microelectrodes that are used to make the pigeon fly up-down-left-right, so this probably is possible for over a decade. You can control such a bird very accurately e.g. by making a detailed map of (part of) a city and using a computer to make the bird fly over houses, land in gardens, etc. By mounting a camera you can fly the bird like you are the bird, e.g. usng a computer screen. I believe it is also possible today to use electrodes picking up your brain signals and controlling the bird, i.e. be the bird.

About Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) attacks

Besides the mind, electronic weapons exist, and are used, that attack the human body. Many of the effects resemble common diseases which is no coincidence as these (often horrible) attacks are carefully designed to avoid suspicion and leave no evidence. A limited list of the effects of these weapons:

• Scratching
• Stomach pain
• Urge to urinate
• Urge to defecate
• Diareah
• Coughing
• Sneezing
• Sleepiness
• Yawning
• Stomach pain
• Kidney pain
• Painful feet
• Painful legs
• Sleeping hands
• Heart attack
• Bubling stomach
• Blurred vision
• Nausea
• Fatigue
• Heating head/body
• Spleen pain
• Muscle pain
• Chest pain
• Blind gut attack
• Back pain
• Racing heart
• Runny nose
• Erection problems
• Toothache
• Headache
• Hearing problems
• Sudden confusion
• Sudden memory loss

Many effects can be achieved suddenly, i.e. within a second, instant coughing, instant sneezing, pain, etc. These weapons are used for over a decade by our national secret services. Often almost random innocent people, civilians, including children, are attacked, experimented upon. Many do not know what is happening and just collapse. Victims come from all over the world but most are from Western countries, they call themselves often targeted individuals.

Human rights and (Remote) Electronic Mind Reading and (Remote) Electronic Mind Control

Mind reading and mind control are against the law. The same is true using directed energy weapons on civilians including children. Some governments may suggest this is not the case but that is just a lie. Every government saying it acknowledges human rights while at the same time using/allowing the use of these technologies on almost random innocent people is a criminal organization and the representatives of these organizations (President, Prime Minister, Secretary of Defense, secret services directors, etc.) are criminals that must be jailed for life.

Mark Rich, Boston.

Sources:

• http://www.thehiddenevil.com
• http://www.newworldwar.org

MIND CONTROL : (Remote) Electronic Mind Reading & (Remote) Electronic Mind Control #3

Protection against (Remote) Electronic Mind Reading and (Remote) Electronic Mind Control

Protection against electronic mind reading is only possible using some kind of scrambler device, sending random signals, or advanced shielding. If you suspect your mind is being read you may want to start thinking different while doing things, e.g. while typing a password or pin code, think of different/random numbers and letters (this is not easy, but you can learn to do this). Also, you can try to think about certain things, just to generate thoughts and keep your attackers busy. Protection against electronic mind control is possible by being very aware that this can be done to you.

Many people listen to this little voice inside their head telli ng them to do this or to do that. This is something you can never do when you suspect someone is trying to control your mind! Never listen to the little voice inside your head again! You will have to develop extra awareness about your thoughts. When you have a thought, think about it, is it normal to have such a thought? If not, simply discard it and do not think about it again. Electronic mind control is often done to synchronize events. E.g. they make you think about person X, and then have person X call you. This is funny the first time, but such things happening all the time will certainly drive you crazy. They can also monitor your friend in his home and when your friend goes to the toilet, they make you think of your friend and you will call him. Now suppose this happens several times, then your friend will start thinking weird thoughts about you. These are just examples of what can be done. To prevent such incidents to happen, randomize the time you react to your thoughts (or events) and sometimes do not react at all. I call this: breaking the loop.

Applications of (Remote) Electronic Mind Reading and (Remote) Electronic Mind Control

Besides many good things, this technology can also be used for the worst. Some examples, individual related:

• Drive a person into schizophrenic behaviour
• Steal by mind reading: bank accounts, pin codes, innovative ideas
• Blackmail a person by obtaining secrets by mind reading
• Mar k a person dangerous, based on some thought (many people people have some times)
• Use a random person as a spy, by hearing through his ears and seeing through the eyes
• Create terrorists by feeding their minds with terrorist ideas
• Torture a person by letting him/her know that his/her thoughts are no longer private
• Etc.

In addition, this technology can also be used to control groups of people. Example: assume you want a revolution somewhere, e.g. in the U.S.A. Then you just ‘transmit’ the words ‘Obama murderer’ to specific area’s and have som e co-operatives from NGO’s triggering the masses by shouting the same (Google: voice of God weapon).

Mark Rich, Boston.

Sources:

• http://www.thehiddenevil.com
• http://www.newworldwar.org

MIND CONTROL : Effects of GHz radiation on the human nervous system : Recent developments in the technology of political control

Analysis on Mind Control Electromagnetic Weapons

By Harlan E. Girard

NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Coherent and Emergent Phenomena in Biomolecular Systems, University of Arizona 15 January 1991

Theme: Militarization and WMD, Police State & Civil Rights

Paper presented by Harlan E. Girard, NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Coherent and Emergent Phenomena in Biomolecular Systems, The University of Arizona, January 15-1991

Abstract

The United States has developed communications equipment which can make the blind see, the deaf hear and the lame walk. It can relieve the terminally ill of all pain, without the use of any drugs. A man might retain the use of all his faculties up until the day of his death.

This communications equipment depends on a new way of looking at the human brain and neuromuscular system, and gigahertz radiation pulsed at ultra-low frequencies.

Some of this equipment is now operational within the Central Intelligence Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. It will never be used to make the blind see and the deaf hear and the lame walk because its use is central to the domestic political agenda and foreign policy of James A. Baker and George Herbert Walker Bush.

Domestically, the new communications equipment is being used to torture and murder persons who match profiles imagined to be able to screen a given population for terrorists, to torture and murder citizens who belong to organizations which promote peace and development in Central America, to torture and murder citizens who belong to organizations opposed to the deployment and use of nuclear weapons, and to create a race of slaves called Automatons or what is popularly called the Manchurian Candidate.

Overseas, experimentation is taking place on hostages held by the United States in Canada, Great Britain, Australia, Germany, Finland and France. In addition, there has been a long series of bizarre suicides among British computer scientists, all of whom had some connection to the United States Navy.

Considenng how recklessly, wantonly and indiscriminately America’s new weapons have been used, physicians attending the dead and dying should consider the patients known political views and associations before making a diagnosis or conducting an autopsy.

INTRODUCTION

In 1988 the Office of Technology Assessment of the Congress of the United States published a special report titled. Criminal Justice: New Technologies and the Constitution. The report surveys the new technologies used in the investigation, apprehension, and confinement of criminals and addresses that delicate balance to be maintained between the national interest and individual rights.

As welcome as this report is to those of us who are interested in a government of law rather than of men, it manages to omit any discussion of the use of directed energy weapons from the section on less than lethal weapons. For instance, a weapon has been developed to paralyze a person at a distance, through a brick wall, if necessary. This weapon was developed during 1983-4 for use in situations where hostages are being held. A variation of this weapon has been purchased by the Marine Corps, for confusing and disorienting the enemy.

American weapons research has centered on pulsed radiation in the gigahertz frequency band for a very interesting reason. In 1972, the Department of the Army researched Soviet and other foreign literature sources and discovered over 500 studies devoted to the biological effects of SHF – super-high frequency electromagnetic oscillations. (1)

SHF may have potential use as a technique for altering human behavior. …Lethal and non-lethal aspects have been shown to exist. In certain non-lethal exposures, definite behavioral changes have occurred. There also appears to be a change in mammals, when exposed to SHF, in sensitivity to sound, light, and olfactory stimuli.

The significance of this intelligence document in terms of the medical experiments commissioned by the Central Intelligence Agency since 1976 is that emphasis in this report is placed on influencing individuals as opposed to groups.

Secondly, this report is a trend study and therefore contains statements predicting Soviet knowledge and capabilities for influencing human behavior up to fifteen years ahead, or 1987. It foreshadows the enormous effort put into behavior control experiments employing the use of lasers and microwave beam weapons on involuntary human subjects during the Reagan-Bush regime.

Thirdly, despite the report’s title. Controlled Offensive Behavior – USSR. it opens with a chapter describing the use of torture on Catholic prisoners in British jails in Northern Ireland. The inclusion of this chapter at all, and its position at the front of the report. clearly is intended to suggest that it is permissible for the United States to torture its own citizens because these methods are being used by our very civilized cousins in Britain, and not only barbarians in the Soviet Union.

Fourthly, the report states that, The purpose of mind altering techniques is to create one or more of several different possible states in the conscious or unconscious area of the brain. The ultimate goal of controlled offensive behavior might well be the total submission of one’s will to some outside force.

After discussing some of the possible states short of complete submission which may be the goal of Soviet research in behavior control, the author states, Since the desired end product of this type of research is some change in the human mind, only the non-lethal aspects are discussed in this report. It should be remembered, however, that some techniques have lethal thresholds.

In the current round of American behavior control experiments, no allowance is made for lethal thresholds. The use of involuntary human subjects provided by the Central Intelligence Agency precludes the necessity for researchers to consider lethal thresholds and legal consequences.

A curious situation has emerged in which torturers and murderers attend our meetings, address us on the failings of our own research, and misdirect us with papers on the benign effects of incubating eggs in 60-herz magnetic fields, in order to buy time for their own well paid and frequently lethal experiments on involuntary human subjects.

Another document which will be of interest to those wishing baclground information concemmg the technology of political control is The Search for the Manchurian Candidate: The CIA and Mind Control by John Marks. It was published in 1977 but has recently 1,1988) been reprinted by Dell Publishing, with an introduction by Thomas Powers.

Of special interest are the.chapters concerning experiments with electrodes in the brain, which were the true forerunner of current experimentation involving invading the human brain and nervous system with gigahertz frequency masers and microwave beam weapons.

Of particular interest in the light of current developments are two paragraphs in the very last chapter which concern a Boston-based CIA front organization, the Scientific Engineering Institute, which still exists, not so incidentally. The SEI was initially established to do research on radar! In the 1960′s the SEI added a wing devoted to life sciences, and hired a group of behavioral and medical scientists.

Marks reports, One veteran recalls a colleague joking, If you could find the natural radio frequency of a person’s sphincter, you could make him run out of the room real fast. Turning serious, the veteran states the technique was plausible. and he notes that many of The crazy ideas bandied about at lunch developed into concrete projects. Just how concrete that proposal to find the natural radio frequency of the human anal (and penile) sphincter became, Marks had no way of knowing at the lime he wrote his book.

Lastly, I would like to cite another Defense Intelligence Agency report also prepared by the US Army. It is titled. Biological Effects of Elertromagnetic Radiation (Radiowaves and Microwaves) Eurasian Communist Countries It was published by the Defense Intelligence Agency in March, 1976.

The importance of this report rests not on its content, much of which seems to remains classified, but in its acknowledgement of a shift in focus, in less than four years from a wide range of behavior control interests to just one, electromagnetic radiation.

The date of this report is also significant: it was published when George Herbert Walker Bush became Director of Central Intelligence. Experiments on involuntary human subjects were rapidly authorized by the new Director, but to take place outside of the United States because of the wrath of Congress at that time.

An experiment was begun in Edmomon. Alberta. Canada, under the aegis of an American oil company with which the DCI was on friendly terms. It consisted initially of blasting a man s brain with the microwave analog of sound waves for 2-3 hours a day. This has the effect of producing auditory hallucinations.

For an explanation of how audible voices are broadcast directly into the brain, see _Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications_, James C. Lin, Ph.D., Thomas Springfield, ll, 1978. For audible volces and their uses in intelligence operations also see _The Body Electric; Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life_, Robert D. Becker, M.D. and Gary Selden, Morrow, N.Y., 1985, particularly pages 317 et seq.

TECHNOLOGY & METHODS

A further discussion of events leading up the present series of mind control experiments will have to await another occasion, in favor of a discussion of the technology ef which the United States is now possessed.

As I have already indicated, one of the principal features of the weapon system is its ability to produce auditory effects, or hallucinations. Using these effects to broadcast defeat into the minds of the enemy was a particular dream of Lt. Gen. Leonard Perroots, U.SA.F. He hired droves of consultants to tell him how to use a microwave beam to implant ideas in the mind of the enemy, and to be perfectly fair, to urge on his own troops to superhuman deeds of valor.

One consultant I have spoken with advised Perroots that it is no more possible to implant ideas in the brain with microwaves than it is possible to implant ideas in a computer with microwaves. He pointed out the impossibility of knowing where any particular bit of informaiion is stored.

The effect this had on Perroots was really quite predictable, considering the hubris of the man, and his access to unlimited amounts of money through the bloated, American defense budget. He kept on hiring consultants until he found one who promised him results, knowing thai he, Perroots, would be long retired before anyone could safely say his fair- haired boy was a charlatan.

The smug complacency of the former consultant I spoke with was equally predictable. When I confronted him with the fact that medical atrocities are being committed on innocent human beings, he refused to discuss the subject with me until I could describe the process to him. Subsequently, I stumbled across Lin’s book on microwave auditory effects.

I called the former consultant back again, and again implored him to step forward and be counted. This time, confronted with the process being used, he told me that I had to expiain to him the mechanism by which microwaves produce auditory effects! Changing tack, I told him that the mechanism is irrelevant; the process is being used on slave labor in efforts to create the Manchurian Candidate.

His reaction was just as predictable as Perroots’, given the isolation and arrogance of academia. He assured me that such experiments couldn’t be going on because HE had Forestalled that happening. HE had told Lt. Gen. Perroots that it couldn’t be done, so Perroots had gone out to fly a kite and forgotten about it.

Actually, that is what should have happened Instead, Perroots turned to a man who promised him results. This man remembered the microwave analog audiograms used by Dr. Joseph Sharp to beam auditory hallucinations into his own head at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in 1973. He promised Perroots that he would talk a human being to death if he was furnished with the equipment Sharp had used at Walter Reed, a slave, and personal security.

This was the origin of the medical atrocities which begin in Edmonton, Alberta in 1976, under the protection of the Central Intelligence Agency, and continue to this day.

By the fall of 1983, experiments had produced some communications equipment which far exceeded the simple dream of broadcasting defeat into the minds of the enemy. It is not only capable of producing auditory hallucinations, but visual hallucinations as well. The visual hallucinations have been described to me by a German artist, on whom this equipment is being used involuntarily, as having the quality of 35mm color slides.

Besides these sensory hallucinations, the same equipment can be used to block all sensation. It is being used to distort and even completely block all senses. With it the ultimate in sensory deprivation experiments can be performed. There’s no peaking under the electromagnetic blindfold this equipment creates.

I should mention in this context, that the Central Intelligence Agency now has at its disposal the most evil, the most cunning torture devised by any government in all of human history. It is truly satanic in its moral and ethical implications. It is a torture which is commensurate with the degeneracy of a nation which is prepared and well on its way to polluting all life on earth into extinction.

The torture I am writing of I can only descibe as thought deprivation. It is used in conjunction with sensory deprivation but it is in fact sensory deprivation times 10^(10).

We are all famiiliar with the sensation of being exposed to very loud noises. They are irritating, and we try to remove ourselves from them. We might say, It’s so noisy in here, I can’t hear myself think.

Human beings perceive thought as audible sound. It is something which we hear. We listen to ourselves think. This quality of listening to ourselves think, of hearing our own thoughts, can be extinguished by this device, so that it is _not_ possible to hear oneself think.

I have no idea how this effect is produced. It may be accomplished by playing a signal into the auditory nerve at such a high power that it does in fact drown out the sound of all thought, but I do not believe that is how it is being done. I do not know enough about the physiology of the brain to explain how it might be done, but the Central Intelligence Agency can do it with the mind control technology at its disposal.

That is the bad news. The good news is that one continues to think even if one cannot hear oneself think. Do not panic. There is nothing to fear.

On the other hand, our thought process is what distinguishes man from other forms of life. Cogito ergo sum. But cogito is no longer necessarily possible. Where does this leave sum?

Furthermore, this communications equipment is able to produce pain, enormous amounts of pain. Pain is only another nerve signal, and pain is applied in great quantities in the torture regimen.

Sometimes the pain is specific and describable, more often it is general and indescnbable. It is very much like being immersed in water, only it isn’t water it is pain The pain surges and laps at one. like water.

I have also described this pain as being very much like having an electric current passing through one’s body. It is like having one’s finger held in an electric socket and being unable to turn the current off. Except, this torture is used for years on end.

A skeptic might well ask why? If the United States has such equipment, why is it being used to torture innocents and not Saddam Hussein?. The answer is the cowardice factor.

It is quite one thing to torture innocents for a few hours a day, a few days a week, and then retire to a nearby hotel to soak your liver in beer served from frosty mugs. It is quite another to spend your afternoons and evenings in Baghdad, confined to a room commensurate with your cover story, because you don’t speak Arabic, wondering how soon you will be betrayed.

This is the cowardice factor. What good is it to earn big bucks if your life is put at risk? Paitriotism? Forget about it. Torturing a man through a cinder block wall is the ultimate act of cowardice. The mere invention is a reflection of the complete moral and phy.sial corruption of American society.

But America is also an intellectually corrupt country. Once the Central Intelligence Agency had discovered the Fountain of Death, it didn’t know how to use it. The best idea they could come up with was to resurrect the protocols of the infamous Dr. Ewen Cameron, subsiitftung the new technology for the low tech equipment he had employed.

Readers who are interested in the protocols of the deranged Dr. Cameron may consult John Marks’ book, cited earlier. There have recently been several books published on the subject of Cameron, as well. This new interest resulted from survivors of his medical atrocities suing the CIA for compensation.

Among the books recently published, I would recommend Journey Into Madness by Clordon Thomas. The American edition came out in May, 1990.

A skeptic might also ask how it is possible to apply the Cameron brainwashing technique, called depatterning, to an American citizen in the privacy of his own home. This is in fact the $64 dollar question, with no obvious answer to rational men and women.

Firstly, every effort is made to incarcerate the victim in a friendly hospital where his or her mind can be crushed at the leisure of the CIA- Failmg this it is usually possible to at least get a false diagnosis from a corrupt physician that the victim has a potential psychiatric problem which may require institutionalization at some future date.

The effor to incarcerate the victim requires the cooperation of someone in the victim’s family or work environment. The Central Intelligence Agency uses the term authority figure to describe this player, because he or she is an authority on the victim, and will step forward at the appropriate moment and demand that the victim be incarcerated or agree with the physician that the victim should be incarnated.

Failing the presence of an authority, the victim may simply be kidnapped and placed in confinement, or the CIA may use unlawfu1 restraint to hold the victim in confinement temporarily. It’s not a pretty picture.

If all attempts at incarceration fail. or when the victim must be released, then the victim is tortured m the pnvacy of his own home- This is possible because the effects are produced by electromagnetic radiation, which passes freely through seemingly solid walls

The brainwashing begins by picking victims who are isolated in the first place, preferrably living alone, by soliciting the cooperation of the victims friends and acquaintances. In other societies these people wouldn’t be called friends, they would be called informers.

The Central Intelligence Agency then attempts to isolate the individual from people whom they plan to corrupt — the victlm’s support network. This is done by making the victim difficult to be with. At the same tune, every effort is made to make the vktim suspicious of his friends and colleagues so he will avoid them of his own, free will.

To augment this process, members of the victims support network may simply be purchased to spread rumors concerning the victim, with the intention of further isolating him or her. This aspect of the process may be and is, carried to the extreme of simply murdering members of the victims support network.

The process of discrediting the victim, isolating the victim, is a continuous one, and isolating the victim from members of the opposite sex, particularly potential sex partners, is a central feature of this process.

This is the background. The foreground is the adaptation of the Cameron depatterning technique. The central feature of this is to use microwave auditory effects in place of the tapeplayer and headset which Cameron used in a part of the process called psychic driving.

The microwave auditory effects are used to humiliate and ridicule the victim, and to express the torturers contempt for the victim, which is also expressed through the application of copious amounts of pain.

Contempt is also expressed by breaking and entering the victims home and burglarizing it on a daily basis. The victim is allowed no privacy whatsoever His every action is commented on disparagingly. This is accomplished by bugging the victim’s home with an array of devices, including video and sound sensors.

The quality of the bugging equipment available to the CIA today is beyond the imagination of the average man. These sensors have been miniaturized to the point where no visual inspection will every discover them. And they are sensitive beyond belief The bugging devices themselves could be the subject of a separate paper.

CONCLUSION

The Manchurian Candidate 1990 is quite a different fellow than his 1956 counterpart. He is no longer an hypnoticaly preprogrammed assaassin; his behavior is programmed and fed into a computer, which biomechanically drives him to his predetermined and destructive destiny, just like the cruise missiles manufactured by General Electric Aerospace

When I pick up a copy of Blomedica1 Engineering, I am struck by the fact that all of the research in it is unnecessary, duplicates research accomplished five to 15 years ago by the Central Intelligence Agency. The difference between our research and theirs is that scientists employed by the CIA work on involuntary human subjects, slaves if you will, furnished to them by their employer. They do not have to be concerned with lethal thresholds.

The process which the microwave weapon employs is described in a paper titled, The Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low-Intensity Conflict, by Cap. Paul E. Tyler, Medical Command, United States Navy. His paper, presented at least a year after the murder which leaves no traces had already been perfected, sets forth the coneptual basis from which the development of the microwave beam weaponry began. It is worth reading.

Captain Tyler’s paper was presented at a workshop conducted by Air University Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education in March, 1984. His paper is included in a collection titled, Low-Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology, edited by Lt. Col. David J. Dean, United States Air Force, and published by Air University Press, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama in June, 1986. The book is available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.

If there are skeptics among you, and I hope that there are, the benign results of the Central Intelligence Agency’s research can be seen on television nearly every night. Take a film clip of George Herbert Walker Bush at the end of the Malta summit with President Gorbachev and compare it with a film clip of George Bush campaigning for the Republican nomination in 1988. The pitch of his voice has been significantly lowered, he speaks in complete sentences and no longer in sentence fragments, and his gestures are appropriate to the oratorical point he is making rather than empty and fluttery gesticulations.

I have no problem with the CIA’s enhancing George Bush’s public image. After all, he is former Director of Central Intelligence, and authorized experiments on involuntary human subjects with maser and microwave beam weapons in February, 1976.

I have more trouble with the use of this equipment to neutralize Michael Dukakis’ campaign for President in 1988, by making his public image wooden and plodding.

I have even more trouble with the use of this equipment to bring Kitty Dukakis to the brink of suicide, in order to enhance the prospects of George Bush’s choice of political

opponent in 1992 Jesse Jackson. Now that the Supreme Court has been neutralized as an instrument for social justice, neutralizing the Congress has become the Central Intelligence Agencys principal objective. A Jackson nomination is most likely to divide and crush the Democratic Party.

Think about what I have written. Perhaps it will help to explain classified work which is going on in a laboratory near you. Perhaps it will even help to explain work which you have been asked to do.

What do you know about research aimed at the computer control of human beings through masers aimed at acupuncture points, or muscle groups?

What do you know about the torture and rape and murder of persons of both sexes using masers and microwave beam weapons designed to be used in combat training and simulation systems?

What do you know about a magnetic beam weapon, meant to temporarily disable any device employing an electric motor, or transistors, without permanently damaging it?

What do you know about the development of a tactile intelligence exploitation system designed to maintain control of political activists as they travel, anywhere in the world?

If you have such information, have a few words with me before the end of the of Workshop, or speak out on this subject in a forum of your own choosing. The more who speak out, the less likely it is that any one of us will be victimized for what we say.

In any case, only the illusion of Constitutional government remains in the United States. Do not be afraid. The worst is yet to come.

REFERENCES

1. This 54 page report went out of print in March, 1990. It is available at libraries which have been designated Government Document Depositories.

2. For a discussion of a similar weapon, see An X-Band Microwave Life-Detection System in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol 33, No. 7; July, 1986.

3. This information was leaked by a British scientist to a British investigator, and appears in City limits, London, Aug 9 – Aug 16, 1990. This weapon is described as a microwave pulse radar, and is believed to work by rapidly heating the brain.

4. Super-high frequency radiation is a term applied to wave lengths between a decimeter and centimeter long. It corresponds roughly with a frequency range of 1-100 gigahertz.

5. Controlled Offensive Behavior – USSR, by Captain John D. LaMothe, Medical Intelligence Office. Department of the Army. This intelligence document was published by the Defense Intelligence Agency in July, 1972.

About the Author

Harlan E. Girard was born in Cleveland, OH in 1936. He studied for the B. Chem. E. degree at Cornell University, and received the B.A. degree in economics from The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, from which he graduated in 1957.

Since 1988, Mr. Girard has been pursuing independent research into the harmful effects ot radiation on biological systems. He is a member of the Bioelectromagnetics Society and IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

In 1989, the Federal Bureau of Investigation refused Mr. Girard access to his own file on the grounds that it is 93exempt from mandatory release on the basis of 5 U.S.C. a7522 (b) (1)94. This section of the United States Code is applicable to documents 93 to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy.

Mr. Girard is flattered to have been made a peer of J. Robert Oppenheimer et al., despite the fact that he has never applied for a security clearance from the Department of Defense or held a job which required one. On the other hand, since 1983, he has been an involuntary human subject in medical experiments commissioned by the Central Intelligence Agency, which has of course made him privy to a great deal of highly classified and extremely sensitive information.

MIND CONTROL : (Remote) Electronic Mind Reading & (Remote) Electronic Mind Control #2

(Remote) Electronic Mind Reading

(Remote) Electronic Mind Reading is about receiving thoughts from your brain using very sensitive electronic receivers (like a radio receiver) and decoding these signals using computers and computer programs into statements what you are thinking of. The state of technology of electronic mind reading is at this moment of writing:

• You have no knowledge that someone is tuning in on your brain Any person can receive your brain signals without you knowing that this is being done.
• It is not possible to block the reading of your mind You cannot turn off your brain, also your brain does not have a firewall. The only way to block the reading of your mind is to use something like a brain signals scrambler, compare a mobile phone blocker. There are reports that e.g. Obama carries such a device with him all the time.
• Your thoughts can be read from a distance It is more easy but not required to put a pickup coil on your skull to pick up signals from the brain. An implant is not necessary but can be helpfull to select and amplify signals generated by the brain. Your brain signals can be picked up from at least a few kilometers distance.
• Decoding your sub-vocal speech, i.e. words spoken to oneself without actually speaking, is easy Sub-vocal speech causes more clear signals, also speech is a slow process (compared to computing power).
• It is possible to decode your deeper thoughts but there is more chance of errors here Decoding deeper thoughts is possible at the moment as well but has it’s limitations. It is possible to decode certain words, although not very accurate. Also, because of the massive processing nature of our brain, it is difficult to establish the proper context of words.
• Recent science reports mention reconstruction of images seen through your eyes, but I cannot confirm this. One such a report shows that brain signals from a group of people seeing the same image, shows great similarity. This tells us that reconstruction of images seen by the brain is not very far away.

About image reconstruction from brain signals: Targets of these kinds of attacks mention that secret services agents have technology that enables them to look through the target’s eyes. My own experience is that when you are a target, you are surrounded by agents, monitoring equipment, often aircraft monitoring you, 24/7. One of the things they do is look at what you (your eyes) are looking at. This information is fed back to you by reoccurring identical events/persons, email messages, zaps on your body, etc. Everything is done to make you believe they look through your eyes. I certainly believe this will be possible in very near future, maybe it can be done now, but I have not yet experienced this (and I have experienced a lot).

(Remote) Electronic Mind Control

(Remote) Electronic Mind Control is about triggering brain functions including forcing thoughts into your brain, using transmitters controlled by computers and computer programs. The state of technology of electronic mind control is at this moment of writing:

• You have no knowledge that someone is trying to control your brain Any person can send triggers to your brain without you knowing this. You may feel acting strange, like why am I doing this, or what am I doing here.
• It is not possible to block the control of your mind You cannot turn off your brain, also your brain does not have a firewall.
• Your mind can be controlled from a distance I experienced mind controlled other people when outside meaning that it certainly is possible to trigger your brain from at least a few kilometers distance.
• It is possible to make you hear voices Silent sound, V2K (Voice-to-skull), microwave hearing are names given to technology capable of making you hear sounds including voices, not by your ears. Most sound weapons can be aimed very accurate so you hear these voices while people around you do not. Most of this technology is over 25 years old.
• It is possible to force thoughts into your brain that make you think of someone/something and/or do things This far more advanced and dangerous method forces thoughts into your brain without you being capable of recoqnizing the fact that it is not your own thought. It can best be described as a thought that should not be there. Examples: – You may walk into your kitchen and at the moment you arrive there find it peculiar because there is nothing to do there, you just got up and walked there. – You keep being ‘bothered’ by a thought that is just a name of a person you know. – You start singing a certain song while there is no reason to sing this song.
• It is possible to make you dream about certain things Induced dreams are dreams like normal dreams except that often they are really weird, often including accidents or death, and you can remember almost every detail when you wake up.
• It is possible to make you sexually exited Area’s of the brain have been discovered to become active when you are having sex. It is possible to activate these area using external stimuli. When you are a man you get an erection. This is also what recent studies showed.

Many, if not all, of the above is also described in detail on the internet by many targets of gang stalking (organized stalking) and electronic harassment (electronic torture). About sexual exitement, when you are a man they also can ‘beam-away’ your erection within 15-30 seconds using directed energy weapons (DEW).

Mark Rich, Boston.

Sources:

• http://www.thehiddenevil.com
• http://www.newworldwar.org